Manoj Kumar Barala v. Union Of India And ORS

$~22.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7096/2017 MANOJ KUMAR BARALA ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through Ms. Archana Gaur & Ms. Ridhima Gaur, Advocates for UOI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

O R D E R

% 18.08.2017 Counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance notice, states that the application of the petitioner for voluntary retirement is being considered and in view of the consideration, the movement order has been kept in abeyance till 30th September, 2017.

In view of the statement made by the counsel for the respondents, the present writ petition is rendered infructuous, and is disposed of. However, the petitioner will be at liberty to invoke jurisdiction of appropriate forum, if need arises.

SANJIV KHANNA, J.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J.

AUGUST 18, 2017 MR