← Library
High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./2688/2016

Amit Mukesh Aggarwal v. The State

2017-03-01Hon'Ble Mr. Justice S.P.Garg2 pages

$-15 to 17 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN, 2688/2016 & Crl.M.B.2287/2016 AMITMUKESHAGGARWAL Petitioner Through : Mr.Sameer Dewan, Advocate.

( versus THE STATE Respondent Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with SI Surender Kumar, PS Hari Nagar.

Father of the complainant is present.

+ BAIL APPLN. 2689/2016 & Crl.M.B.2288/2016 VINODPOPLI Petitioner Through : Mr.Sameer Dewan, Advocate., versus STATE Respondent Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with SI Surender Kumar, PS Hari Nagar.

Father of the complainant is present.

AND + BAIL APPLN. 2691/2016 RAKESH CHAWLA Petitioner Through: Mr.Sameer Dewan, Advocate, versus GOVT. OF NCT (STATE) Respondent Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with SI Surender Kumar, PS Hari Nagar.

Father of the complainant is present.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

ORDER

o/o 01.03.2017 1.

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. BAIL APPLN. 2688/2016 & connected matters By:AMULYA

in case FIR No.616/2016 registered under Sections 420/34 IPG at PS Hari Nagar. Status report is on record.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties including the father of the complainant (Mr. Jay ant Kumar) and have examined the file. By an order dated 03.01.2017, the petitioners were granted interim protection and were directed to join the investigation as and when required. Undisputedly, the petitioners have joined the investigation since then.

3.

Vide order dated 03.01.2017, the petitioners were directed to pay tl lacs to the complainant without prejudice and subject to future adjustment (if any).

Complainant s father informed that in compliance of the said order the amount of ?7 lacs has been received. He has no objection to the confirmation of the bail. 4.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, they be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of? 50,000/- with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer. They shall, however, join the investigation as and when required.

5.

The bail applications stand disposed of. Pending applications also stand disposed of.

:garg, j MARCH 01, 2017 / tr BAIL APPLN. 2688/2016 & connected matters