The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Giesecke & Devrient (India) Pvt. Ltd.

$~33 to 35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 1085/2017, C.M. APPL.43426/2017 THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 ..... Appellant versus GOODYEAR INDIA PVT. LTD.

..... Respondent + ITA 1086/2017, C.M. APPL.43427/2017 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 ..... Appellant versus GIESECKE & DEVRIENT (INDIA) PVT. LTD.

..... Respondent + ITA 1087/2017, C.M. APPL.43428/2017 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 ..... Appellant versus GIESECKE & DEVRIENT (INDIA) PVT. LTD.

..... Respondent Through : Sh. Ruchir Bhatia, for the appellant, in Item Nos. 33 to 35.

Sh. Harpreet Singh Ajmani and Sh. Rohan Khare, Advocates, for respondent, in Item Nos. 34 and 35. Sh. Neeraj Jain and Sh. Aniket. D. Agrawal, Advocates, for respondent, in Item No.33.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 29.11.2017 The question raised by the Revenue in these appeals, viz., whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) can extend an interim order beyond the statutorily permissible limit of 365 days has been answered in the affirmative by this Court in Pepsi Food Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT 2015 (376) ITR 87 (Del).

The appeals are accordingly dismissed.

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J NOVEMBER 29, 2017/ajk