Kumkum Talwar And ORS v. Natasha Kohli And ANR

$~SB-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2161/2015 KUMKUM TALWAR & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through:

Mr. Deepak Khosla, Adv.

Versus

NATASHA KOHLI & ANR ..... Defendants Through:

Ms. Nandita Rao, Adv. for D-1.

Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Adv. for D-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

O R D E R

% 13.05.2020 [VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING] IA No.___/2020 (for exemption) & IA No.____/2020 (for deferment of time for payment of court fee) 1.

Allowed, subject to just exceptions and in terms of prevalent rules. 2.

The applications are disposed of.

Review Application No.101/2020 & IA No.3828/2020 3.

Considering the nature of the averments advanced in the review application and the other application, the hearing thereof is not possible, without completion of pleadings thereon.

4.

The counsel for the review petitioner also agrees. CS(OS) 2161/2015

5.

Issue notice.

6.

Notice is accepted by the counsels for Natasha Kohli and Rishabh Kohli. 7.

Replies to both the applications be filed within two weeks. 8.

Rejoinder within one week thereafter.

9.

The counsel for the review petitioner to ensure that no additional averments are made in the rejoinder which will entail a sur-rejoinder. 10.

Though the counsel for review petitioner has asked for interim relief of stay of the order of which review is sought but no ground therefor is made out. 11.

List on 10th June, 2020.

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

MAY 13, 2020 'bs'

CS(OS) 2161/2015