High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./3093/2015
Rohit Sehgal & ORS v. Rakesh Sehgal
2016-09-08Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Nandrajog1 pages
$~24 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 3093/2015 ROHIT SEHGAL & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by:
Mr.Archit Vasudeva, Advocate versus RAKESH SEHGAL ..... Respondent Represented by:
None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
O R D E R
% 08.09.2016 1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that since no stay was granted the trial proceeded and the petitioners have been discharged and instant petition which lays a challenge to the order summoning the petitioners has been rendered infructuous and may be permitted to be withdrawn.
2.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
3.
No costs.
Crl.M.A.11020/2015 Dismissed as infructuous.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J SEPTEMBER 08, 2016 skb