Hav/Chm (Op-Ciph) Jayan V v. Union Of India & ORS
$~4 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 10703/2018 & CM APPL. 41692/2018 HAV/CHM (OP-CIPH) JAYAN V ..... Petitioner Through:
Mr. Indra Sen Singh and Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocates.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through:
Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Abhigyan Siddhant, Advocate.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
% 27.11.2018
1. In terms of the previous order, learned counsel for the Petitioner had confined his relief to prayer (b) which reads as under: "(b)Issue a writ of mandamus further directing the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to appear in the competitive examination to be held in future for selection for posting to IMTRAT Signal Company (Bhutan) in the vacancy of HAV/CHM (Operator-Cipher), in case for any reason he is not posted to IMTRAT until 31.12.2018."
2. Today, learned counsel for the Respondents has produced before the Court a letter dated 17th October 2018 from the Senior Record Officer wherein it is stated as under:
17th Oct 2018 Legal Cell HQ Delhi Area Armed Forces Tribunal
(Principal Branch) HQ Delhi Area Delhi CAntt-10 AGAINST NON SELECTION OF TO IMTRAT
1. Pl ref your Sig No 3547/6783/HC/LC dt 13th Oct 2018.
2. It is submitted that No. 15671443P Hav (Now CHM) (Op Ciph) Jayan V was screened in the rank of Hav. As per para 2 of DG Sigs (sigs 4(b) Standing Operating Procedure Case file No. B/44368/Sigs 4(b-2) IMTRAT/R dated 27th May 2013 to IMTRAT (Copy att), WE 4511/20009/1 for Indian Military Training Team, Bhutan (Copy att) and para 3 (b) of DG Sigs letter No. B/44344/Sigs 4 (b-2)/IMTT/R dated 07 Jul 2017 (Copy att), candidate will be screened for IMTRAT Panel based on Trade and Rank structure.
However, NCO have all opportunities/chances to screen iin his next rank/future service subject to service profile meeting the eligibility criteria as and when seniority comes up.
3. This is for your information pl.
(Rama Murthy J) Lt Col Senior Record Officer For OIC records"
3. In that view of the matter, no further orders are called for. The petition is disposed of.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SANJEEV NARULA, J.
NOVEMBER 27, 2018 nk