Vijay Luthra v. Satish Anand

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 488/2018 VIJAY LUTHRA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Mr. Manish Chaudhary and Mr. Asish Kumar Sharma, Advocates versus SATISH ANAND ..... Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

O R D E R

% 29.02.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM APPL. 42407/2018 (stay) 1.

As reflected from order dated 24.10.2019, possession of the subject premises already stands restored to the respondent/landlord. 2.

Be awaited for counsel for both sides.

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J FEBRUARY 29, 2024/rk 3.

Even in this second call in post-lunch session none appears on behalf of respondent/landlord. Learned counsel for petitioner/tenant seeks permission to withdraw this petition as possession of the subject premises stood restored to the respondent/landlord as reflected from order dated The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:40:35

24.10.2019. Apparently, this is the reason that for past few dates none is appearing for respondent/landlord.

4.

As requested, the petition and all pending applications are disposed of as withdrawn.

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J FEBRUARY 29, 2024/rk Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:40:35