Mukesh Tyagi v. State (Govt Of NCT)

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1632/2017 MUKESH TYAGI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Naveen Gaur, Mr.Kaushlinder Singh & Ms.Babita Saini, Advocates.

versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT) ..... Respondent Through:

Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Amit Bhardwaj, PS Timar Pur

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 24.08.2017 1.

By way of this application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. the petitioner is seeking regular bail in case FIR No.273/2017 under Sections 307 IPC & 25/54/59 Arms Act, PS Timar Pur, Delhi.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 22nd June, 2017 and the nature of injury allegedly suffered in this case was opined to be simple.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR and except the disclosure statement there is no material against him to show his involvement. BAIL APPLN. 1632/2017

4.

Status report has been filed by the State along with copy of the MLC which confirms that the nature of the injury suffered in this case is simple. 5.

Learned APP for the State has submitted that the petitioner is friend of the husband of the complainant and on that day he had been frequently talking to the husband of the complainant. In the FIR lodged by the complainant Natasha, she suspected the hand of her husband Mukesh Kumar behind the occurrence. Further it is not disputed that in the CCTV footage collected in respect of the incident the presence of the petitioner at the spot cannot be seen.

6.

Learned APP for the State further submits that the name of the petitioner appeared in the disclosure statement made by Deshraj who was arrested in this case on 21st June, 2017.

7.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner is admitted to bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/link Court, subject to the following conditions:

(i) He shall not leave the country without the permission of the Court. (i) He shall not try to influence or contact the witnesses in any manner. 8.

The bail application is allowed in the above terms. 9.

Copy of this order be sent to the Jail Superintendent for information. Order dasti.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

AUGUST 24, 2017 'hkaur'

BAIL APPLN. 1632/2017