Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Gupta v. State

$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3134/2018 ROHIT KUMAR @ ROHIT GUPTA ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr.Sumit Chaudhary and Ms.Aakanksha Bansal, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by:

Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for the State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 10.10.2018 Crl.M.A.No.34028/2018 Allowed subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(Crl.) No.3134/2018 1.

By this petition, the petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to file a Special Leave Petition. The petitioner was convicted by the learned Trial Court for offences punishable under Sections 302/148/324/452 IPC however in appeal before this Court the petitioner was acquitted for offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and the sentence under Sections 148/324 was upheld and under Section 452 IPC the same was modified. 2.

As per the nominal roll, the remaining portion of the petitioner's sentence is 4 months and 12 days.

W.P.(CRL) 3134/2018

3.

Considering the unexpired portion of the sentence, this Court finds no ground to grant parole to the petitioner.

4.

Petition is dismissed.

5.

Copy of this order be communicated to the petitioner through Superintendent, Mandoli Jail.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

OCTOBER 10, 2018 mamta W.P.(CRL) 3134/2018