Mohd Yusuf v. Taj Mohd & ANR

$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 492/2018 MOHD YUSUF .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Dashmesh Tripathi, Adv.

versus TAJ MOHD & ANR .....Respondents Through:

Mr.

Amit Dhaka, Adv.

for respondents.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

O R D E R

% 15.12.2025 1.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that the vacant and peaceful possession of the subject premises has already been handed over to the respondents/ landlords.

2.

In furtherance to the order dated 06.10.2025, learned counsel for the tenant submits that he does not wish to make any submission. 3.

Considering that the vacant and peaceful possession of the subject premises has already been handed over to the respondents/ landlords as recorded in the order dated 06.10.2025, in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in N.C. Daga vs. Inder Mohan Singh Rana: 2003(1) SCC 453 and Vinod Kumar Verma vs. Manmohan Verma & Anr. [Civil Appeal Nos.5220-5221 of 2008, order dated 19.08.2008], the present petition has become infructuous as there is nothing surviving therein.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2025 at 12:50:41

4.

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. SAURABH BANERJEE, J DECEMBER 15, 2025/bh The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2025 at 12:50:41