Rising India Publication Pvt Ltd & ANR v. Union Of India & ANR
$~51.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 655/2018 & C.M.No.49057/2018 (stay) RISING INDIA PUBLICATION PVT. LTD & ANR. ..... Appellants Through:
Mr.Ankur Yadav, Adv.
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
..... Respondents Through:
Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr.Brajesh Kumar, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R
% 27.11.2018 C.M.No.49059-60/2018 (exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
C.M.No.49061/2018 (delay in refilling) & C.M.No.49058/2018 (delay in filing) For the reasons stated in the applications, delay in filing as well as refiling is condoned and the applications are disposed of. LPA 655/2018 1.
Seeking exception to an order passed by the learned Writ Court in W.P.(C) No.11157/2017 rejecting the writ petition filed by the petitioner and upholding an order passed by the respondent-department cancelling the empanelment of the petitioner for receiving advertisement on DAVP rate, the Appeal in question has been filed under Clause10 of the Letters Patent. 2.
The learned writ Court has taken note of the Print Media LPA 655/2018
Advertisement Policy of the Government of India, 2016 as well as the advisory issued by the DAVP on 5th May 2017 and has recorded a finding that the petitioner did not submit RNI or ABC circular verification certificate and finding the petitioner not to fulfil the criteria of having 45,000/- circulation or certificate showing the said circulation as required under the Policy, the writ petition has been dismissed. 3.
The learned writ Court has considered in detail all the aspects of the matter and finding the petitioner not entitled to the benefit in accordance with the policy and primarily finding that the petitioner has not submitted the required circular verification certificate from the competent authority, the writ petition has been dismissed. In doing so, in our considered view, the learned writ Court has not committed any error warranting reconsideration.
4.
The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. The pending applications also stand dismissed.
CHIEF JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO, J NOVEMBER 27, 2018 'anb'
LPA 655/2018