High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/1639/2015

Naresh Kumar v. State

2015-08-05Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar2 pages

$~59 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 1639/2015 NARESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.S.K. Sethi and Mr. D. Sharma, Advs.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC with Mr.Rohit Kaul, Adv. with SI Vijay Kumar, PS Prashant Vihar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

O R D E R

% 05.08.2015 The petitioner seeks release on parole in order to attend to his ailing mother who is suffering from cough and breathlessness. During the course of hearing, the status report was filed by Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Standing Counsel.

The status report reveals that the family of the petitioner is very poor and mother of petitioner is suffering from cough and breathlessness.

Nominal roll of the petitioner suggests that she was released on parole from 5.8.2014 to 2.9.2014. The other parole application for attending the marriage of his brother was rejected by the competent authority. The conduct of the petitioner in jail is unsatisfactory and he has been slapped with three punishments. Nonetheless after the punishment which was meted out to him, the petitioner was released on parole for a specified period by

order of this Court.

Considering the illness of the mother of the petitioner, let the petitioner be released on parole for a period of 15 days from the date of his release on his furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, subject to the following conditions:- a) The petitioner shall surrender before the jail authorities on or before the expiry of the said period of parole. b) The petitioner shall not engage himself in any unlawful activity. c) If the petitioner is required to go out of the territory of Delhi, he would intimate about his visit to the SHO of the concerned police station.

d) He shall furnish his mobile telephone number and the mobile telephone number of the surety to the SHO of the concerned police station so that in case of necessity he could be tracked and his whereabouts could be ascertained.

In case, the petitioner flouts any one of the conditions, an application could be moved by the SHO for cancellation of his parole and for taking of the coercive steps for securing his attendance. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. A copy of this order be communicated to the Superintendent of the concerned Jail for information and compliance. Dasti.

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J AUGUST 05, 2015/ns