Amir & ORS v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ORS

Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

$l4I49 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 3656/2016 HASEEN AHMED (MUNNA ) & ORS.

Petitioners Through : Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through :Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with Inspector Sanjeev Kumar, SHO, SI Babu Lal and ASI Joginder, P.S.

Jamia Nagar for the State Respondent no. 2 in person.

AND + W.P. (CRL.) 2418 /2017 & CRL.M.A. 14107/2017 AMIR & ORS.

.... Petitioners Through Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Adv.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through Ms. Megha Bahi, Adv. for Mr. Avi Singh, ASC with Inspector Sanjeev Kumar, SHO, SI Babu Lal and ASI Joginder, P.S. Jamia Nagar for the State Mr. Noor Alam, Adv. for respondent nos. 2 with father of respondent no. 2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

ORDER

% 30.08.2017 Petitioners (accused) and private respondent Danish (represented

through his father Shri Haseen Ahmad) and Mohd. Shahid (represented through his brother Mohd. Amir) are stated to have settled their disputes amicably. It is prayed that two cross FIRs may be quashed, details whereof are as under:- FIR No. 737/2016 under Sections 323/324/341/451/506/34 IPC registered at P.S. Jamia Nagar on the complaint of Mohd. Danish (respondent no. 2), complainant in W.P. (Cr!.) No. 2418/2017. FIR No. 691/2016 under Sections 323/308/451/34 IPC registered at P.S. Jamia Nagar on the complaint of Mohd. Shahid (respondent no. 3), complainant in Cr!. M.C. No. 3656/20 16.

Shri Haseen Ahmad and Mohd. Amir are present in Court along with their respective counsels and have been identified by SI Babu La!, PS. Jamia A Nagar. They submit that the matter has been settled, inasmuch as, the settlement has been arrived at without any undue force, pressure or coercion exerted by the petitioners. Memorandums of Understanding dated 1St March, 2017 and 251h September, 2016 respectively have been placed on record and have been admitted as correct. It is submitted that abovementioned FIRs may be quashed, in view of the settlement.

Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the accused

persons and the complainant/injured, who are neighbours, in the interest of justice both the FIRs, that is, FIR No. 737/2016 under Sections 323/324/341/451/506/34 IPC and FIR No. 691/2016 under Sections 323/308/451/34 IPC, both registered at P.S. Jamia Nagar and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Faheem Ahmad is stated to be in judicial custody in this case. He be released from jail, if not required in any other case.

Both the petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous. Dasti. A.K. PATHAK, J.

AUGUST 30, 2017 rb L