Subhash Chander v. Lekh Raj

$~5 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CONT.CAS(C) 824/2018 SUBHASH CHANDER ..... Petitioner Through:

None.

versus LEKH RAJ ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL

O R D E R

% 30.05.2019 1.

There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner has not appeared even on the last date of hearing. 2.

Mr.

Yeeshu Jain, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent/LAC submits that they have already complied with the orders dated 18.03.2013 and 21.07.2016.

3.

It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the petition. The petition is accordingly dismissed in default and for nonprosecution. VINOD GOEL, J.

MAY 30, 2019 'AA'