Neelam Bansal v. The State

$- 1 to 7 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

BAIL APPLN. 2551/2018 KRISHAN LAL BANSAL THE STATE & ANR BAIL APPLN. 2560/2018 CHANDER BHAN BANSAL Represented by: Mr. R.D. Singh, Advocate THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with BAIL APPLN. 2563/2018 NEELAM BANSAL Represented-by:

THE STATE page 1 0/4 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

Represented by :

BAIL APPLN. 2564/2018 SURESH KUMAR BANSAL THE STATE & ANR BAIL APPLN. 2566/2018 VIVEK BANSAL THE STATE & ANR BAIL APPLN. 2568/2018 APAAR BANSAL BAIL APPLN. 2551/2018 and connt, matters of 4

Vl Represented by: Mr. R.D. Singh, Advocate THE STATE & ANR BAIL APPLN. 2569/2018 GARIMA BANSAL THE STATE

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

ORDER

% 12.11.2018 Crl.M.A. No. 35233/2018 (Exemption^ in BAIL APPLN. 2551/2018 CrI.M.A. No. 35282/2018 (ExemptionJ in BAIT. APPLN. 2560/2018 CrI.M.A. No. 35297/2018 (Exemption^ in BAIL APPLN. 2563/2018 Crl.M.A. No. 35298/2018 (ExemptionJ in BAIT. APPLN. 2564/2018 CrI.M.A. No. 35305/2018 (Exemption^ in BAH. APPLN. 2566/2018 CrI.M.A. No. 35310/2018 (Exemption^ in BAIL APPLN. 2568/2018 Crl.M.A. No. 35311/2018 (Exemption^ in BAIL APPLN. 2569/2018 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

i BAIL APPLN. 2551/2018, BAIL APPLN. 2560/2018. BAIL APPT N. 2563/2018, BAIL APPLN. 2564/2018. BAIL APPLN. 2566/2018. BAIT. APPLN. 2568/2018 and BAIL APPLN. 2569/2018 By the impugned order the anticipatory bail applications of the petitioners were dismissed as premature for the reason no FIR was registered.

Learned APP for the State submits that FIR has now been registered on 7^*^ November, 2018.

Learned counsel for the petitioners would be at liberty to take remedy before the learned Additional Sessions Judge. Petitions are dismissed with liberty as noted above. NOVEMBER 12,2018 MUKTA GUPTA, J.

'yo'