Rashi v. Union Of India And ANR.

$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11734/2018 RASHI ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Pateek Tushar Mohanty, Advocate.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

..... Respondents Through : Mr.Sarthak Katyal, Advocate for Ms.Monika Arora, Advocate for R1.

Ms. Anuja Saxena, Advocate for R2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

O R D E R

% 30.10.2018 1.

Vide the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks direction to respondent No. 1 to act on the complaint dated 28.09.2018 and the complaint dated 12.10.2018 of the petitioner in terms of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 and the Office Memorandum dated 27.11.2014 of the Department of Personnel and Training and also the provisions of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965. 2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1 submits that they have not received a copy of the writ petition filed by the petitioner, therefore, this court may direct the petitioner to supply the copy of the petition and accordingly, the action on the complaint filed by the petitioner would be taken as per law.

3.

Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to supply a complete set of paper book to learned counsels appearing on behalf of respondents during the course of the day.

4.

Respondents are directed to look into the complaint filed by the petitioner and take an action on it, accordingly, as per law. 5.

This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J OCTOBER 30, 2018 j