Ritu Garg & ANR. v. State & ORS.

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 602/2018 RITU GARG & ANR.

..... Petitioners Through: Mr. L. K. Singh & Mr. Rajkumar, Advs versus STATE & ORS.

..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Kashyap, Adv for R2 to 5 (Enrolment No.D6924/2018), Chamber No. 52A, Civil Wing, Tis Hazari Courts, Mobile No. 7053427046.

Mr. Shivam Sachdeva, Adv for R6.

CORAM:

SH. RAJ KUMAR TRIPATHI (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

O R D E R

% 11.01.2019 Vakalatnama filed by counsel for respondent No.6. Respondent No.6 has also filed written statement alongwith affidavit for admission/denial of documents.

Mr. Anil Kashyap, Advocate appears and marks his presence on behalf of respondents 2 to 5. He seeks two weeks time to file reply. Let reply/objections to the petition alongwith affidavit for admission/denial of documents be filed by respondents 2 to 5 within the time as sought and prayed for with advance copy to counsel for petitioner.

Petitioner shall file rejoinder alongwith affidavit for admission/denial of documents within four weeks thereafter.

Notice issued to respondent No.1 not received back. Same be awaited. Let fresh notice of petition be issued to respondent No.1 on taking of necessary steps by petitioner within a week by all permissible modes, returnable for next date of hearing, with direction to respondent No.1 to file its response to the petition of petitioner within four weeks from the date of service of notice. Renotify for service report qua respondent No.1, completion of pleadings and marking of exhibits to the documents on 08.03.2019. RAJ KUMAR TRIPATHI (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) JANUARY 11, 2019 sk