Ramky Infrastructure Limited v. Commissioner Of Trade & Taxes

$~14 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 7324/2017 RAMKY INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Rajesh Jain and Mr.

Virag Tiwari, Advocates.

versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Satyakam, Additional Standing Counsel with Mr. Amit Sharma, LA, DTT, GNCTD.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

O R D E R

% 08.09.2017

1. At the outset, Mr. Rajesh Jain, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, clarifies that the refund amount claimed by the Petitioner for the fourth quarter of 2013-14 is Rs.2,64,77,458/- and not the figure stated in the prayer clause.

2. Mr. Satyakam, learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondent, states that the refund claim of the Petitioner would be processed and the refund order issued within four weeks from today. It is directed that the refund amount along with interest due thereon will be paid directly to the account of the Petitioner within two weeks thereafter.

3. If the Petitioner has any grievance regarding non-compliance with the W.P.(C) 7324/2017

above directions and/or the interest amount paid, it would be open to the Petitioner to seek further appropriate remedies, as may be available to the Petitioner, in accordance with law.

4. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. S.MURALIDHAR, J PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J SEPTEMBER 08, 2017 dk W.P.(C) 7324/2017