Vinita Bansal v. Poonam Saxena

$~30 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.L.P. 830/2018 VINITA BANSAL .....Petitioner Through:

Ms. Sangeeta Jain, Adv.

versus POONAM SAXENA .....Respondent Through:

None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

O R D E R

% 06.05.2025 1.

None has appeared on behalf of the respondent despite publication.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent has been acquitted solely for the reason that the loan advanced to the respondent was not reflected in the Income Tax returns.

3.

She submits that once the accused has admitted his signatures, the onus is not on the complainant to show the source of money given to the accused.

4.

The matter requires consideration.

5.

Leave to appeal is granted.

6.

The matter be numbered as CRL.A........(to be numbered) CRL.A........(to be numbered) 7.

None appears for the respondent.

8.

Issue bailable warrants against the respondent for a sum of ₹5,000/- to be executed through the concerned SHO. 9.

List on 18.08.2025.

AMIT MAHAJAN, J MAY 6, 2025 "SS"

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 02:50:47