Piccadily Agro Industries Ltd v. Sh Ashok Kumar And ORS

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2326/2015 PICCADILY AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD ..... Plaintiff Through:

Ms. Mudrika Bansal, proxy for Mr.

Siddharth Bamba, Advocate.

Versus

SH ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS ..... Defendant Through:

Mr. Umang Chopra, proxy for Mr.

S.K. Sharma, Advocate.

CORAM:

SH. J. TRIPATHI, REGISTRAR (ORIGINAL)

O R D E R

% 27.07.2017 On the last date of hearing Mr. Siddharth Bamba, Counsel for the Plaintiff had appeared and made a statement that territorial jurisdiction of this case lies with the District Judge, District Court Jhajjar (Haryana). None was present on behalf of the defendants. Today neither Mr. Siddharth Bamba, nor main counsel on behalf of defendant are present. However, their respective proxies are present. They state that they have instructions to appear in the matter.

Counsel for the plaintiff prays that a date for appearance of the parties before the learned District Judge, District Court Jhajjar (Haryana) may be fixed. Accordingly, with the consent of both the Counsel 24th August, 2017 is fixed as the date for appearance of the

-2- CS(OS) 2326/2015 parties before the learned District Judge, District Court Jhajjar, Haryana. Since the date has been fixed with the consent of both the parties no separate notice is required to be given in terms of Order VII Rule 10-A.

Parties to appear before the learned District Judge, District Court Jhajjar (Haryana) on 24th August, 2017. Deputy Registrar (Original) is directed to return the plaint to counsel for the plaintiff for its representation before the Court of learned District Judge and retain a copy on record. (J. TRIPATHI) REGISTRAR (ORIGINAL) JULY 27, 2017/p