Madhu v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

$-42, 43 and 44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAILAPPLN.

1695/2017 MADHU Through:

Petitioner Mr. Pulkit Batra, Adv.

versus Respondent Dr. M.P. Singh, APP for State with W/ASI Anil Sharma, P.S. H. Nagar.

Mr. Jacob Joseph, Mr. Nayyar Kadar and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advs.

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through:

AND BAIL APPLN. 1709/2017 SANTOSH Petitioner Through:

Mr. PulkitBatra, Adv.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through:

Respondent Dr. M.P. Singh, APP for State with W/ASI Anil Sharma, P.S. H. Nagar.

Mr. Jacob Joseph, Mr. Nayyar Kadar and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advs.

AND BAILAPPLN.

1710/2017 GEETA Through:

Petitioner Mr. Pulkit Batra, Adv.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through:

Respondent Dr. M.P. Singh, APP for State with W/ASI Anil Sharma, P.S. H. Nagar.

Mr. Jacob Joseph, Mr. Nayyar Kadar and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advs.

Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

ORDER

% 11.05.2018 Petitioners-Madhu and Geeta are sisters-in-law;

whereas petitioner-Santoshis mother-in-law of complainant. There are specific allegations against them in the FIR.

Complainant has specifically stated that petitioners came together along with her brother-in-law namely, Ravinder Kumar and poured kerosene oil on her, however, she ran outside. There are other allegations of demand of dowry and harassment as well against the petitioners.

Learned APP points out that offence under Section 307 IPC has been added.

MLC of complainant has been produced and perused wherein doctor has mentioned about smell of kerosene oil in the clothes of the complainant. Keeping in mind these allegations, in my view, no case is made out to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

All the above-noted bail appHcationsare dismissed. A.K. PATHAK, J.

MAY 11,2018/ga