Jatin & ORS. v. State & ANR.

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5519/2018 JATIN & ORS.

..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh, Advocate versus STATE & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP Mr. Sumit Madan, Advocate for respondent No.2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R D E R

% 16.01.2019 CRL.M.A.35276/2018 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 5519/2018 & CRL.M.A.35275/2018 1.

The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.989/2015, under Sections 498A/406/313/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC') registered at P.S.: Najafgarh, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom.

2.

The petitioners and respondent No.2 as well as their respective counsel submitted that the parties have settled their

disputes on their own free will, without any force or coercion, as is evident from the proceedings dated 6.10.2016 before the learned Special Judge, CBI (PC Act), Dwarka, in pursuance whereof, the petitioner No.1 had agreed to pay Rs.3,00,000/- to respondent No.2, out of which Rs.2,00,000/- has already been paid.

3.

Respondent No.2, who is present with her father, submitted that she has no objection to the petition being allowed and the FIR being quashed in case the petitioner No.1 pays the balance amount of Rs.1,00,000/- to her, which is required to be paid as per the Settlement.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have brought a Demand Draft bearing No.120777, dated 14.01.2019, drawn on Punjab National Bank, for an amount of Rs.1,00,000/-, which has been handed over to the respondent No.2 today in the Court.

5.

The Investigating Officer ('IO'), who is present in Court, has identified the petitioners as well as respondent No.2 and has also verified about the said Settlement.

6.

Respondent No.2 further submitted that in view of the payment of the balance amount of Rs.1,00,000/-, the petition may be allowed and the FIR may be quashed.

7.

In view of the aforesaid circumstances and the Settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the parties

entangled in the criminal proceedings. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, FIR No.989/2015, under Sections 498A/406/313/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC') registered at P.S.: Najafgarh, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

8.

Petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending application is also disposed of.

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J JANUARY 16, 2019 tp