Tarun Mittal v. UOI And ANR

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7565/2015 TARUN MITTAL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Deepak Khosla and Mr.Samit Kholsa, Advocates.

versus UOI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for L&B/LAC with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for respondent/LAC.

Mr.Arjun Pant, Advocate for respondent/DDA.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 02.02.2018 Mr.Khosla, counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that upon examination of the record, he is satisfied that the compensation has been received by the petitioner and he has instructions not to press this petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. The Court appreciates the fair stand taken by Mr.Khosla. G.S.SISTANI, J SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J FEBRUARY 02, 2018/ssc