Sanjay Sehgal v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & ORS.

$~56 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 7463/2017 SANJAY SEHGAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Shoaib Haider and Mr. Sanjeev Mishra, Advs.

versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.

..... Respondents Through Ms. Puja Kalra, Adv. for NDMC.

Mr. Sangram Singh, Adv. for SHO, PS Maurya Enclave.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

O R D E R

% 25.08.2017 Petitioner has approached this Court invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court apprehending raising of unauthorized construction by respondent nos. 3 to 5 in or around property no. JP-2, Pitam Pura, Delhi.

As per the photographs annexed to the writ petition, a pit is lying dug-up. It is stated on behalf of the petitioner that a pillar is intended to be raised to have the first floor extended. Ms. Kalra, ld. counsel for the respondents submit that a work stop notice has already been issued and on an inspection carried out yesterday, no construction activity was found getting carried out, though, some building material was found lying there. In other words, according to the respondents, the respondents have already

taken the requisite steps by issuing work stop notice to the SHO to ensure that no construction activity gets carried out. As regards the building material lying in or around the subject premises, Ms. Kalra and Mr. Singh, ld. counsel for the respondents submit that requisite steps for the removal thereof, shall be taken. Let it be done. In the given situation, nothing survives in the instant petition. At this stage, ld. counsel for the petitioner states that respondent no.5 has made certain extension covering with glass wall. Let the instant petition be taken as representation of the petitioner by the respondents and requisite steps be taken, as expeditiously as possible. Petition stands disposed off accordingly.

A. K. CHAWLA, J AUGUST 25, 2017 rc