Mumtaz v. Jagdish Taneja

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 473/2015 MUMTAZ ..... Petitioner Through None versus JAGDISH TANEJA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Muneesh Malhotra, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

O R D E R

% 22.03.2016 Affidavit of undertaking has been placed on record. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the non-compliance in filing of the affidavit of undertaking he may take steps as permitted under law. No further orders are called for as the petition already stands disposed of.

INDERMEET KAUR, J MARCH 22, 2016 gb