← Library
High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./1714/2015

Tejash Mukesh Mehta v. State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi

2017-05-18Hon'Ble Mr. Justice S.P.Garg2 pages

$~31 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1714/2015 TEJASH MUKESH MEHTA ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Sundeep Sehgal, Advocate.

versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Amit Gupta, APP.

Ms.Jagriti Ahuja, Advocate with Mr.Amol Sharma, Advocate for the complainant.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 18.05.2017 1.

The petitioner seeks regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.10/2013 registered under Sections 409/420/467/468/471 IPC at PS EOW. Status Report and Addl. Status Report are on record. 2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties including the counsel for the complainant and have examined the file. The petitioner is in custody since 03.03.2013. Charge against the petitioner was framed on 25.07.2014.

So far only six prosecution witnesses have been examined.

There is no recovery of the cheated money during investigation.

3.

Addl. Status Report reveals that the petitioner is a permanent resident of Bilba Kunj Co-operative Housing Society, Building BAIL APPLN. 1714/2015

No.24B, Flat No.8, 3rd Floor, Dombiwali West Thane, Maharashtra. He is owner of the said property and presently his parents are residing therein.

Addl. Status Report further reveals that embargo has been imposed on the said properties through Sub Registrar, Dombiwali West, Thane, Maharashtra as it was probably purchased by the cheated amount. It further reflects that Smt.Pradnya Tejash Mukesh Mehta - petitioner's wife along with her children is residing at 007, Vighnesh Building, Dhanashree Prathama Complex, Nandivu Tekdi, Dombiwali (E), Thane, Maharashtra, which is her parental permanent residence. Both the addresses have been verified and confirmed. 4.

Learned counsel for the complainant bank did not contest the bail application seriously. The petitioner is not involved in any other criminal case.

5.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is admitted to bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `1 lac with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. The petitioner shall not travel abroad without prior permission of the Trial Court.

6.

The bail application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J.

MAY 18, 2017 / tr BAIL APPLN. 1714/2015