High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/11871/2018

Ram Swaroop Agarwal Private Iti v. Directorate General Of Training And ANR.

2018-11-01Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Indermeet Kaur2 pages

$~127 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11871/2018 RAM SWAROOP AGARWAL PRIVATE ITI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Yashwant Singh Yadav, Advocate with Mr. M.A. Karthik and Mr. Anubhav, Advocates.

versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING AND ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Gaurang Kanth, CGSC for Respondent No. 1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

O R D E R

% 01.11.2018 CM APPL 45984/2018 (for Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 11871/2018 and CM APPL 45985/2018 (Stay) Impugned order of 13th September, 2018 (Annexure- A1) deaffiliates petitioner but gives no reason as to why petitioner along with other ITIs has been de-affiliated. Impugned order is passed on the basis of Inspection Report, which was conducted way back in the year 2016. It is the case of petitioner that copy of Inspection Report was supplied to

petitioner and petitioner had made a representation to respondent No. 1 on 06.08.2016, but there is no response to it. On the contrary, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for respondent No. 1 supports the impugned order and relies upon Inspection Report and submits that de-affiliation was proceeded on the basis of Minutes of Meeting of 21.05.2018 (Annexure A-9). Despite service of advance notice, there is no appearance on behalf of second respondent.

Upon hearing and on perusal of impugned order and material on record, I find that no response has been given to petitioner's Representation by second respondent.

In the facts and circumstance of the case, this petition and the application are disposed of with direction to respondent No. 2 to give speaking response to petitioner's Representation within two weeks of receipt of this order, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies, as available in law, if need be. Till the needful is done, impugned order be not acted upon and no admissions be made by petitioner till de-affiliation issue is resolved.

Second respondent be apprised of this order forthwith, to ensure its compliance.

With aforesaid directions, this petition and application are disposed of.

(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE NOVEMBER 01, 2018 p'ma