Smt. Indu Rani @ Indu Rathi v. Varista Lease Pvt. Ltd. And ORS.

$~18 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 11806/2018 & CM APPL.45732/2018 SMT. INDU RANI @ INDU RATHI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Kumar, Advocate versus VARISTA LEASE PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr.B.S.Mathur, Advocate with Mr.Rajat Mathur and Ms.Aditee, Advocates for R-1.

Ms.Warisha Farasat, Advocate for R6 & R-7.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 31.10.2018 The impugned order dated 31.08.2018 perused and the same is reproduced below:

"Present :Shri B.S. Mathur, Counsel for Petitioner. :

Shri Naveen Bhardwaj, Counsel for R-6, G.S.

:

Shri S.S. Rathi, Husband of R-1.

1. Representative of R-1 requested for adjournment as the counsel is hospitalised. He also file copy of medical certificate.

2. Counsel for Petitioner requested that he is seeking only direction to concerned SDM/RA to dispose off his application

under Order 7 Rule 11.

3. Heard all the parties.

4. Case is remanded back to the concerned SDM/RA for fresh hearing on the application under Order 7 Rule 11 and dispose off the matter as early as possible or within three months. Case is disposed off accordingly.

5. File be consigned to Record Room after completion." The dispute pertains under Order 7 Rule 11 and which is between the Court and the respondents, therefore, nothing survives in the petition. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. I.S.MEHTA, J OCTOBER 31, 2018 sr