← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/7816/2015

Vijay Julka & ANR. v. Ramesh Dugar & ORS.

2017-04-27Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli,Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal3 pages

$~2 to 5.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7815/2015 and CM APPL. 15502/2015, 4116/2017 VIJAY JULKA AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sermon Rawat, Advocate and Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate with petitioner No.1 in person.

versus M/S SAMRIDDHI MEGA STRCTURES AND ORS...... Respondents Through: Ms. Jasmine Kottai, Adv. for R-1.

+ W.P.(C) 7816/2015 and CM APPL. 15509/2015, 4067/2017 VIJAY JULKA & ANR.

..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sermon Rawat, Advocate and Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate with petitioner No.1 in person.

versus RAMESH DUGAR & ORS.

..... Respondents Through: Ms. Jasmine Kottai, Adv. for R-1.

Mr. B.L. Wali, Advocate for R-6.

+ W.P.(C) 7817/2015 and CM APPL. 15513/2015, 4113/2017 VIJAY JULKA AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sermon Rawat, Advocate and Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate with petitioner No.1 in person.

versus RAMESH DUGAR AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through: Ms. Jasmine Kottai, Adv. for R-1.

Mr. B.L. Wali, Advocate for R-7.

WP(C) 7815/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 3

+ W.P.(C) 7820/2015 and CM APPL. 15525/2015, 4066/2017 VIJAY JULKA & ANR.

..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sermon Rawat, Advocate and Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate with petitioner No.1 in person.

versus M/S. SAMRIDDHI MEGA STRUCTURES LTD. & ORS.

..... Respondents Through: None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 27.04.2017 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states on instructions that he does not wish to press the present petitions as AAIFR and BIFR stand dissolved and all proceedings before the said fora stand abated with effect from 01.12.2016, the date on which the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act, 2003 was given effect to, in terms of the Gazette Notification No.2794 dated 28.11.2016. He, however, reserves the right of the petitioners to approach the National Company Law Tribunal for appropriate relief, in accordance with law.

WP(C) 7815/2015 & connected matters Page 2 of 3

2.

Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn alongwith the pending applications. HIMA KOHLI, J SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J APRIL 27, 2017 rkb/mk WP(C) 7815/2015 & connected matters Page 3 of 3