← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./3665/2017

Raman Chaudhary v. Govt Of NCT Of Delhi & ORS

2017-09-11Hon'Ble Mr. Justice I.S.Mehta2 pages

$~46 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 3665/2017 RAMAN CHAUDHARY ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Anuj Jain, Advocate versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghei APP for State with SI Shailendra Singh, PS-Sunlight Colony Ms. Anita Sharma, Advocate with R-2 present in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 11.09.2017 CRL.M.A.14943/2017 Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 3665/2017 This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.423/2014, under Sections 354/451 IPC, registered at Police StationSunlight Colony, Delhi and all proceedings emanating therefrom. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner and the respondent No.2 are neighbours and due to some misunderstanding a quarrel had taken place between them, resultantly, the complainant lodged FIR No. 423/2014, under Sections 354/451 IPC at Police Station-Sunlight Colony, Delhi. He has further submitted that after registration of the FIR qua against the petitioner, the relatives and the friends intervened and the matter has been settled between the parties before the Mediation Centre, Saket Courts,

New Delhi on 03.05.2016. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that all disputes have been amicably settled between the parties and nothing remains to be adjudicated further and submits that the FIR in question is coming as hurdle in the way of the present petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner and the respondent No.2 want to lead peaceful life in near future and since all disputes have been settled between them, the FIR in question and all proceedings arising therefrom may be quashed. The respondent No.2/complainant Ms.Riya Raj is present in Court today and has been identified by the Investigating Officer SI Shailendra Singh, PS-Sunlight Colony. The respondent No.2/complainant also admits that the matter has been amicably settled with the petitioner and she has no claim or grievance left against the petitioner. She further submits that the settlement/compromise has taken place voluntarily, without any force, pressure or coercion. She further submits that she has no objection if the FIR in question is quashed.

Looking into the above facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and nothing remains to be adjudicated further, to have peace in the life of the parties, I deem it appropriate to quash the FIR No.423/2014, under Sections 354/451 IPC, registered at Police Station-Sunlight Colony, Delhi and all proceedings emanating therefrom.

The present petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly. Copy of the order be given dasti.

I.S.MEHTA, J SEPTEMBER 11, 2017 RV