Fair Deal Leather Suppliers v. Commissioner Of Delhi Value Added Tax, Department Of Trade & Taxes & ANR.

$~ 14 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 7602/2017 FAIR DEAL LEATHER SUPPLIERS ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Mukesh Gupta with Mr. Keshav Rai, Advocates.

versus COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX, DEPARTMENT OF TRADE & TAXES & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Varun Nischal, Advocate with Ms. Sakshi (LA, VAT Deptt.)

CORAM:

JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

O R D E R

% 22.09.2017

1. Learned counsel for the Respondent submits that the refund order has been issued. As far as the interest is concerned, learned counsel for the Respondent states that for the period during which C-Forms were not available, the payment of the amount will be subject to appeals preferred by the Revenue before the Supreme Court against the order dated 19th January 2017 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 10701 of 2016 i.e. (Vizien Organics v. Commissioner, Trade & Taxes).

2. As regards the delay in paying the refund after the C-Form was made available, it is submitted that as and when Form DVAT 21 is furnished by the Petitioner, the interest component for the above period will be issued within one week thereafter.

3. The said assurance is taken on board. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. If there is any grievance regarding non-complaince with the above direction or assurance, it would be open to the Petitioner to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

S. MURALIDHAR, J.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

SEPTEMBER 22, 2017 srb