Aktiebolaget Volvo & ORS. v. Mr. Ramesh Bansal & ORS.

#2 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 1220/2018 & I.A. 15196/2018 AKTIEBOLAGET VOLVO & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Pravin Anand with Ms. Vaishali Mittal, Mr. Siddhant Chamola and Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocates versus MR. RAMESH BANSAL & ORS.

..... Defendants Through Mr. Amarendra Kumar Dubey, Advocate.

Mr. Ramesh Bansal, D-1 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

O R D E R

% 21.12.2018 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, passing off, damages, delivery up etc. After some arguments, learned counsel for the defendants on instruction of defendant no. 1, who is personally present in Court, states that the defendants have no objection if the present suit is decreed in accordance with paragraph 34(a) and (b) of the plaint as well as for damages of Rs.10,00,000/-. He also states that the goods handed over on superdari shall be destroyed in the presence of an authorised representative of the plaintiff on 24th December, 2018.

In view of the aforesaid statements/undertakings, learned counsel for plaintiffs does not wish to press for any other or further relief. The statements/undertakings given by learned counsel for the defendants are accepted by this Court and defendants are held bound by the same.

Registry is directed to prepare decree sheet accordingly. Registry is also directed to issue to an authorised representative of the plaintiffs a certificate authorizing him/her to receive back from the Collector full amount of the Court fee paid by them in the present suit. With the aforesaid observations, present suit and pending application stand disposed of.

MANMOHAN, J DECEMBER 21, 2018 rn