Aktibolaget Volvo & ORS. v. Mr. Ganesh Singh Parmar & ANR.

#3 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 1221/2018 & I.A. 15204/2018 AKTIBOLAGET VOLVO & ORS.

..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Pravin Anand with Ms. Vaishali Mittal, Mr. Siddhant Chamola and Mr. Vivek A., Advocates versus MR. GANESH SINGH PARMAR & ANR. ..... Defendants Through Mr. Ankur Chibber with Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates.

Mr. Ganesh Singh Parmar, D-1 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

O R D E R

% 21.12.2018 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, passing off, damages, delivery up etc. After some arguments, learned counsel for the defendants on instruction of defendant no. 1, who is personally present in Court, states that the defendants have no objection if the present suit is decreed in accordance with paragraph 33(a) and (b) of the plaint as well as for damages of Rs.10,00,000/-.

In view of the aforesaid statements/undertakings, learned counsel for plaintiffs does not wish to press for any other or further relief.

The statements/undertakings given by learned counsel for the defendants are accepted by this Court and defendants are held bound by the same.

Registry is directed to prepare decree sheet accordingly. Registry is also directed to issue to an authorised representative of the plaintiffs a certificate authorizing him/her to receive back from the Collector full amount of the Court fee paid by them in the present suit. With the aforesaid observations, present suit and pending application stand disposed of.

MANMOHAN, J DECEMBER 21, 2018 rn