Rajesh Taneja & ORS v. State & ORS

/ Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

$8, 10 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3490/20 17 RAJESH TANEJA & ORS Petitioners Through: Mr.Manoj Chaudhary & Mr.Sachin Anand, Advocates versus STATE & ORS . Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Laxman PS Janakpuri AND + W.P.(CRL) 2470/20 17 RAJESH TANEJA & ORS Through:

Petitioners Mr.Manoj Chaudhary & Mr.Sachin Anand, Advocates versus STATE & ORS Respondents Through: Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with Mr.Sachin Gupta, Adv.

with W/SI Reema PS Janak Pun AND + W.P.(CRL) 2472/20 17 RAJESH TANEJA & ORS Through:

Petitioners Mr.Manoj Chaudhary & Mr.Sachin Anand, Advocates q versus STATE & ORS Respondents Through: Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with Mr.Sachin Gupta, Adv.

with W/SI Reema PS Janak Pun CRL.M.C. 3490/2017, W.P.(CRL) Nos.2470/2017 & 2472/2017

LI

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RAN!

ORDER

% 31.08.2017 CRL.M.A.14198/2017 in CRL.M.C.3490/2017 CRL.M.A. 14177/2017 in W.P.(Crl.)2470/20 17 CRL.M.A. 14192/2017 in W.P.(Crl.)2472/201 7 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 3490/2017, W.P.(CRL) Nos.2470/2017 & 2472/2017 By way of these petitions, petitioners are seeking quashing of cases being FIR No.1083/2014 under Sections 323/506/509/34 IPC, FIR No.798/2014 under Section 354 IPC and FIR No.1084/2014 under Sections 354/509/506/323/34 IPC, all registered at PS Janak Puri on the basis of settlement.

Today learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw these petitions.

The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

PRATIBHA RAN!, J.

AUGUST 31, 2017 At 'pg'

CRL.M.C. 3490/2017, W.P.(CRL) Nos.2470/2017 & 2472/2017