← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/3413/2018

Jasmohan Singh v. State & ORS.

2019-11-26Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Indermeet Kaur3 pages

\ $-56

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRLI 3389/2018 & CRL.M.A. 35672/2018 GURLEEN KAUR & ANR.

..... Petitioners Through Mr Mahendra Rana, Mr Sourabh Gupta, Mr Puneet Yadav, Mr Tarun Arora, Advocates.

versus STATE & ORS.

Respondents Through Mr Sanjay Lao, ASC with Mr Karanjeet Sharma Advocate for EOW Cell.

Mr Vishal Gohri, Advocate for R2 and R3.

SI Kulbir, P.S. EOW Cell present.

w' I 57./ /' W.P.(CRL) 3413/2018 & CRL.MA. 35795/2018 / JASMOHAN SINGH Petitioner Through Mr Mahendra Rana, Mr Sourabh Gupta, Mr Puneet Yadav, Mr Tarun Arora, Advocates.

versus s i STATE & ORS.

Respondents Through Mr Sanjay Lao, ASC with Mr Karanjeet Sharma Advocate for EOW Cell.

Mr Vishal Gohri, Advocate for R2 and R3.

SI Kulbir, P.S. EOW Cell present.

| I

CORAM:

i HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

ORDER

% 26.11.2019 By:AMULYA

1.

The petitioners have filed the present petitions, inter alia, praying that FIR No. 0208/2018 under Sections 420/406/120-B IPC, registered with Police Station Economic Offences Wing and all proceedings emanating therefrom, be quashed.

2.

The said FIR was registered at the instance of Smt Smita Chatwal, who is arrayed as respondent no.2 in these petitions. Respondent no.2 is represented through her constituted attorney, Sh Rakesh Bhutani, who is present in Court and is identified by the Investigating Officer. 3.

In addition to the complaint made by respondent no.2 (Smt. Smita Chatwal), complaints were also filed by Mr Vineet Malhotra and Ms Krishani Chatwal. Both Mr Vineet Malhotra and Ms Krishani Chatwal are also represented by their constituted attorney Sh Rakesh Bhutani. 4.

Mr Rakesh Bhutani states that the said complainants have no fiirther grievance against the petitioners or any other person accused or involved in the FIR in question. He states that the said disputes have been resolved between the parties and prays that the FIR in question be quashed. 5.

The petitioners are present in Court and identified by their counsel. They also confirm that they have resolved all the disputes with the said complainants and pray that the FIR in question be quashed. 6.

In view of the above, this Court considers it apposite to allow the present petitions. The petitions are allowed and FIR No. 0208/2018 under Sections 420/406/120-B IPC, registered with Police Station Economic Offences Wing and all proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

'A 7.

All pending applications are also disposed of. 8.

The concerned parties shall sign this order in acknowledgement of their statements recorded herein.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J NOVEMBER 26,2019 pkv ^ >- ^ CN V 0'5» i)Qt. /U> r ^ M hv T Stzsi^'S^ ^