Sandeep @ Laxmi Narayan v. State

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2785/2018 SANDEEP @ LAXMI NARAYAN ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. M. Kashif Khan, Advocate.

Versus

STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. G. M. Farooqui, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Harinder Singh, P.S. Mundka.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

O R D E R

% 14.01.2019 The petitioner seeks bail. The learned counsel for the State submits upon instructions, that the prosecution's case against the petitioner is that the looted amount was given to him.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation is not that the petitioner looted anyone. Meanwhile, the co-accused have already been granted bail almost 21⁄2 years ago and the petitioner is in custody since 04.08.2018.

In the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner is granted bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court concerned, subject to the following conditions:- (i) the petitioner will regularly appear on each and every date of hearing to be fixed by the Trial Court concerned;

(ii) the petitioner will not try to influence, contact or meet the complainant and prosecution witnesses in any manner; (iii) the petitioner will not leave the country without prior permission of the Court and the passport, if any, shall be deposited with the Trial Court concerned; and (iv) in case of change of his new address or contact number, the petitioner will promptly intimate to the SHO/IO of the case and intimate the Trial Court.

The petition stands disposed-off in the above terms. Nothing stated in this order shall be deemed to be an adjudication on the merits of the case.

The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Jail Superintendent, concerned for information and a copy be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties under the signatures of the Court Master. NAJMI WAZIRI, J.

JANUARY 14, 2019 sb