Anil K Gujral v. The State & ANR

$~17 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.REV.P. 538/2015 & Crl.M.B.7625/2015 ANIL K GUJRAL ..... Petitioner Through:

Petitioner in person.

versus THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through;

Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP Mr.Dinesh Priani, Adv. for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 23.01.2019 1.

Petitioner is present in person produced through Jail, pursuant to the production warrants issued by order dated 28.11.2018. 2.

Petitioner impugns judgment dated 02.07.2015 whereby the revision petition filed by the respondent was allowed. Petitioner was initially convicted of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by order on conviction dated 16.05.2013 and was sentenced by order dated 06.09.2013 to pay compensation of Rs.37,79,000/- and in default thereof to undergo six months imprisonment.

3.

Revision petition was filed by the respondent and by the impugned judgment, revision petition was allowed and sentence was enhanced to two years of imprisonment for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and to pay compensation of CRL.REV.P. 538/2015

Rs.37,00,000/- and in default to undergo six months further simple imprisonment.

4.

Nominal roll of the petitioner indicates that petitioner has already undergone the entire sentence as on 15.03.2017 including the in default period. The nominal roll further indicates that petitioner is in custody in other cases.

5.

Petitioner who is produced pursuant to the production warrants submits that in view of the fact that he has completed his sentence in the subject case, he does not wish to press the present petition any further.

6.

In view of the above statement, the petition is disposed of. 7.

Order dasti under the signature of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J JANUARY 23, 2019 rk CRL.REV.P. 538/2015