← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/2477/2017

Ajay Kumar v. State (NCT Of Delhi) & ANR

2018-01-08Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Indermeet Kaur2 pages

,"N $-14& 15 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2477/2017, Crl.M.A.No. 14235/2017, Crl.M.A.No. 14246/2017 & Crl.M.A.No. 14933/2017 AJAY KUMAR Petitioner Through Mr.Saurabh Jam, Mr.Gautam Singh and Mr.Suresh Sharma, Advocates.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ......Respondents Through Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr.Jamal Akhtar, Adv. for State.

Mr.Siddharth Chaturvedi, Adv. with Mr.Anubhav Jam, complainant.

+ W.P.(CRL) 2478/2017, Crl.M.A.No. 14238/2017, Crl.M.A.No.14241/2017 & Crl.M.A.No.14934/2017 SHIV PRIYA & ANR .

.....Petitioner Through Mr.Saurabh Jam, Mr.Gautam Singh and Mr.Suresh Sharma, Advocates.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through Mr.R.S.Kundu, ASC with Mr.Prem Sagar Pal, Adv. for State.

Mr.Siddharth Chaturvedi, Adv. with• Mr.Anubhav Jam, complainant.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

ORDER

% 08.01.2018 Parties have settled their disputes. Present FIR No.0076/2017 has been registered under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the IPC at Police Station Preet Vihar on the complaint of Anubhav Jam, Director of the company namely M/s Moon Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. The By:AMULYA

complainant is present in Court. His presence has been identified by the Investigating Officer. The settlement deed has been placed on record. It is a memorandum of understanding entered into between the parties detailing the terms of their settlement. The parties shall be bound by the terms and conditions stated in the aforenoted settlement which is marked Ex.PA. Parties having arrived at the aforenoted settlement, it is clear that no useful purpose would be served in continuing these proceedings as it would be an exercise in futility. Thus to secure the ends of justice, the FIR No.0076/2017 registered under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the IPC at Police Station Preet Vihar and all proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed. Since the investigation has progressed to a large extent, the State has suffered a brunt on this.

The submission of the learned Public Prosecutor that the petitioner must compensate the State with a cost is a submission which carries force. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to pay a sum of 20,000/- to be deposited with the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee.

Petitions disposed of in the above terms.

INDERMEET KAUR, J JANUARY 08, 2018 ndn