← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./3534/2017

Mohanjeet Singh & ANR v. State(Govt Of NCT Of Delhi) & ORS

2017-09-13Hon'Ble Mr. Justice I.S.Mehta2 pages

$~19 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 3534/2017 MOHANJEET SINGH & ANR ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Rohit P Ranjan, Advocate versus STATE(GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Kamal K Ghei, APP for State with Insp Satya Prakash, EOW Mr. GAurav Srivastava, Advocate for PNB Mr. R K Mittal and Mr. C M Mathur, Advocates for Respondent no.2 with R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 13.09.2017 This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.119/2013, under Sections 420/468/471/120B IPC, registered at Police Station-Barakhamba Road New Delhi and all proceedings emanating therefrom.

Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners and the respondent No.2 Sh. Gurdeep Singh Vohra are related to each other and due to some misunderstanding arisen between the parties, the aforenoted FIR was lodged. He has further submitted that after registration of the FIR qua against the petitioners, the relatives and the friends intervened and the matter has been settled between the parties which has been reduced into writing on 21.08.2017. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that Over Draft has been settled and

the amount due has already been deposited and as such nothing remains to be adjudicated upon further and submits that the FIR in question is coming as hurdle in the way of the present petitioners. He further submits that the petitioners and the respondent No.2 want to lead peaceful life in near future and since all disputes have been settled between them, the FIR in question and all proceedings arising therefrom may be quashed.

The respondent No.2 is present in Court today and has been identified by the Investigating Officer Insp Satya Prakash.

Respondent No.2 admits that the matter has been amicably settled with the petitioners and he has no claim or grievance left against the petitioners. He further submits that the settlement has taken place voluntarily, without any force, pressure or coercion, which has been reduced into writing on 21.08.2017. He further submits that he has no objection if the FIR in question is quashed.

Looking into the above facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and nothing remains to be adjudicated further, to have peace in the life of the parties and to meet the ends of justice, I deem it appropriate to quash the FIR No.119/2013, under Sections 420/468/471/120B IPC, registered at Police Station-Barakhamba Road New Delhi and all proceedings emanating therefrom.

The present petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly. Copy of the order be given dasti.

I.S.MEHTA, J SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 sm