Piccadily Agro Industries Ltd v. Rakesh Kumar And ANR

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2549/2015 PICCADILY AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD ..... Plaintiff Through NONE versus RAKESH KUMAR AND ANR ..... Defendants Through NONE

CORAM:

SH. J. TRIPATHI, REGISTRAR (ORIGINAL)

O R D E R

% 22.09.2017 It is already 11:15 a.m. No one is present on behalf of the parties, nor any application under Order VII, Rule 10-A Code of Civil Procedure has been filed. It appears that the Plaintiff is not interested in moving such an application. Consequently, Deputy Registrar (Original) is directed to get the records scan and return the plaint to Counsel for the Plaintiff for its presentation before the concerned Court to obtain jurisdiction after retaining a copy thereof on record. (J. TRIPATHI) REGISTRAR (ORIGINAL) SEPTEMBER 22, 2017 AP Latter on, Ms. Mudirka Bansal, Proxy Counsel on behalf of Mr. Siddharth Bambha, Counsel for the Plaintiff and Ms. Vijay Laxmi, Proxy Counsel on behalf of Mr. Sanjay Chabbra, Counsel for the Defendant appeared. They state that they

-2CS(OS) 2549/2015 have instructions to appear in the matter. Ms. Mudrika Bansal stated that the territorial jurisdiction of this Court lies with the District Judge, District Court Sonepat (Haryana). She prays that a date for appearance of the parties before the learned District Judge, District Court Sonepat (Haryana) may be fixed. Accordingly, with the consent of both the Counsel 13th October, 2017 is fixed as the date for appearance of the parties before the Learned District Judge, District Court Sonepat (Haryana). Since, the date has been fixed with consent of Counsel for both the parties, no seprate notice is required to be given in terms of order VII Rule 10-A Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties to appear before the learned District Court, Sonepat (Haryana) on 13th October, 2017.

Deputy Registrar, (Original) is directed to get the records scanned, retain a copy on records and return the plaint to the Counsel for plaintiff for its presentation before the Court of learned District Judge, Sonepat. An intimation to this effect be also sent to the learned District Judge, Sonepat, forthwith. (J. TRIPATHI) REGISTRAR (ORIGINAL) SEPTEMBER 22, 2017 AP