Pawan Kumar v. State

$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3472/2018 PAWAN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv.

Versus

STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASC for State with Inspector Vinay Kumar, P.S.Bhalaswa Dairy.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

O R D E R

% 12.12.2018 The petitioner seeks parole for filing a Special Leave Petition in exercise of his constitutional right to seek acquittal against the conviction for which he is undergoing incarceration. He was punished for 10 years of which he has already undergone a sentence of 5 years. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will be the best person to choose, brief and assist a counsel to file the SLP and present his case before the Supreme Court. He also seeks to arrange funds for the same. His address in Delhi has been verified by the Police. His conduct in jail is stated to be satisfactory.

Insofar as the petitioner seeks to exercise his constitutional right, the Court finds no impediment in allowing the present petition. Accordingly, the petitioner is enlarged on parole for a period of four weeks from the date of his release on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail

Superintendent concerned, subject to the following conditions:- (1) He shall report to the SHO of the concerned Police Station once a week during the period of parole.

(2) He shall furnish his telephone number to the SHO concerned, which the petitioner shall keep operational at all times. (3) He shall not leave the territory of NCT of Delhi. (4) The petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Authorities at the expiry of the period of parole.

With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed-off. A copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties and a copy be sent to the Jail Superintendent concerned, for compliance.

NAJMI WAZIRI, J.

DECEMBER 12, 2018/acm