High Court of DelhiRC.REV./459/2015

Om Parkash Ahuja v. Anil Kumar Kashyap

2016-05-18Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Indermeet Kaur2 pages

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 459/2015 OM PARKASH AHUJA ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Shahid Ali and Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocates.

versus ANIL KUMAR KASHYAP ..... Respondent Through Mr.Jaskaran Singh, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

O R D E R

% 18.05.2016 Learned counsel for the respondent seeks an adjournment; this adjournment has been opposed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial is being deliberately delayed and here also respondent is not present to argue the petition.

At this stage, it is agreed that this petition may not be pressed on merits if expedition in the trial is directed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the pleadings are complete and the matter is now listed for evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner/landlord submits that three witnesses are to be examined on his behalf; per contra, tenant will examine two witnesses.

In this background, the Trial Court shall endeavour to expedite

the trial and dispose of the petition preferably within an outer limit of 14 months from the date of the receipt of this order. Petition disposed of.

LCR be sent back.

INDERMEET KAUR, J MAY 18, 2016 ndn