Tasleem v. State

$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1797/2017 TASLEEM ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Jugraj Kapoor, Adv.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP for State along with Investigating Officer.

Mr.

Sachet Sharma, Adv.

for Complainant.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 08.09.2017 Crl. M.A. 14814/2017 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Application is disposed of.

Bail Appln. 1797/2017 Notice. Learned APP accepts notice. Investigating Officer is present along with investigation file.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has not been named in the FIR as his name has surfaced only in the disclosure statement of Azam, who has stated that petitioner had brought the petrol and motorbike. Learned APP does not dispute that the role of petitioner has surfaced only in the disclosure statement of co-accused Azam, who has

already been granted bail. Keeping in mind totality of the circumstances, petitioner is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Application is disposed of.

Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

SEPTEMBER 08, 2017 ga