Ramani Sundaram And ORS v. Delhi Metro Rail Corpn. And ORS

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4509/2018 RAMANI SUNDARAM AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Krishna Kumar and Ms. Srujana Suman Mund, Advocates versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPN. AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for L&B/LAC/respondents no.2 & 4.

Ms. Vibha Mahajan and Ms. Laimon Rani Boro, Advocates for DMRC.

Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel for DDA.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 16.10.2018 Counsel for the petitioners submits that he, in fact, only claims an alternate allotment in lieu of acquisition of the land where the petitioners were running a shop as a tenant. Mr. Kumar submits that the petitioners would be entitled to rehabilitation in terms of the Policy dated 18.10.2012 and 25.10.2006, where even the rights of the petitioners have been recognised. Petitioners seek leave to make a detailed representation to the respondents and seek a direction to the respondents to consider the request of the petitioners expeditiously and sympathetically. Counsels for the respondents submit that in case such a representation is made, the same would be considered in accordance with law within a period of six weeks.

Counsel for the petitioners, at this stage, submits that in case the request

of the petitioners is not considered favourably, he would take such steps as available in accordance with law, including filing of a writ petition in this Court. As prayed, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn in above terms. Liberty, as prayed, is granted.

CM.APPL 23041/2018 also stands disposed of.

G.S.SISTANI, J SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J OCTOBER 16, 2018 pst / W.P.(C) 4509/2018 2/2