Chandan Kumar Tripathi v. State

$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1929/2015 CHANDAN KUMAR TRIPATHI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mohammad Faroz, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, A.S.C. for the State with SI Shyam Sunder PS Dwarka Sector-23

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 25.02.2016 1.

By filing the present writ petition from Jail, the petitioner is seeking parole for a period of two months on the ground of repairing his house and reconnecting social ties with the family & society. 2.

Status report on behalf of the State has been filed. 3.

Nominal roll of the petitioner has also been placed on record as per which the Petitioner has availed three weeks furlough w.e.f. 04.11.2015 to 26.11.2015.

4.

As per Parole/Furlough Guidelines-2010, a minimum period of six months ought to have elapsed from the date of termination of the previous parole/furlough.

5.

In the given facts and circumstances, the prayer of the Petitioner for releasing him on parole is hereby rejected.

6.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

7.

Petitioner be informed through concerned Jail Superintendent about the orders passed.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

FEBRUARY 25, 2016/'pg'