State v. Mumtaz & ORS

$~4.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 586/2017 STATE ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP along with Inspector Subhash Chand, PSBawana, for the State.

versus MUMTAZ & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Anupam S Sharma, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI

O R D E R

% 12.03.2018 We have heard learned counsel for the State as well as the respondents. We are of the view that the impugned judgment needs deeper examination.

We may also observe that the appeal preferred by one of the accused, namely Kishore @ Rinku being Crl. Appeal No.751/2017 is already pending.

Accordingly, leave is granted.

Crl. Appeal No.

/2018 (to be registered and numbered) Let the appeal be registered and numbered.

Admit.

List for hearing along with Crl. Appeal No. 751/2017. The respondents/ accused are admitted to bail upon their furnishing personal bonds with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Joint Registrar (Judicial). For that purpose, list before the Joint Registrar (Judicial) on 02.04.2018.

VIPIN SANGHI, J P.S.TEJI, J MARCH 12, 2018 B.S. Rohella