State v. Mohan @ Sonu

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 536/2017 STATE .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, Ld.

APP for the State with SI Aman P.S.

Mandawali.

versus MOHAN @ SONU .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Dhirendra Kumar and Mr. Bikash Bishwakarma, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 21.04.2025 CRL.L.P. 536/2017 1.

An Application under Section 378(3) of the Cr.P.C has been filed on behalf of the Appellant/State for grant of Leave to Appeal against the Judgment of acquittal dated 28.03.2017, on the grounds that the testimony of the child as well as the mother was recorded which has not been appreciated in the right perspective and the impugned judgment is liable to be set aside. 2.

For the reasons stated in the Application, the Leave to Appeal is allowed.

Crl.APP.No._________/2025 (To be numbered by the Registry) 3.

Arguments heard.

4.

Reserved for Judgment.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J APRIL 21, 2025/va The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2025 at 17:18:44