Vbmk Consttructions Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner Of Vat & ANR.
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8722/2017 VBMK CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.
..... Petitioner Through:
Mr.M.A.Ansari, Advocate with Mr.Khurshid Ahmad, Advocate.
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR.
..... Respondents Through:
Mr.Satyakam, ASC with Ms.Manpreet, L.A., DTT.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R
% 27.09.2017
1. Notice. Mr. Satyakam, the learned ASC, accepts notice for the Respondents and states that the Petitioner has been issued a notice under Section 59(2) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 ('DVAT Act') seeking particulars. A copy thereof has been provided to the learned counsel for the Petitioner.
2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that although F-9 forms have been filed, C-Forms per se have not been submitted.
3. In view of the above and considering that the time period for processing and issuing refund has not yet expired, it would be open to the Petitioner to appear before the VATO concerned purusuant to the aforementioned notice
and thereafter take steps in accordance with law.
4. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. S. MURALIDHAR, J.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
SEPTEMBER 27, 2017 'anb'