Sanjay Gupta v. State & ANR.

$-47 & *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 2702/2018 ANKIT GUPTA Petitioner Through;

Mr. J.K. Bhola, Adv.

versus .... Respondents STATE & ORS.

Through:

Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghei, APP with SI Himanshu Balyan, PS Subhash Place, Delhi + BAIL APPLN. 2704/2018 SANJAY GUPTA Petitioner Through:

Mr. J.K. Bhola, Adv.

versus .... Respondents STATE & ANR.

Through:

Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghei, APP with SI Himanshu Balyan, PS Subhash Place, Delhi

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

ORDER

% 18.12.2018 1.

The petitioners have filed the present anticipatory bail applications under Section 438 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in FIR No.311/2017 registered with Police Station Model Town under Section 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (TPC).

Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

2.

Learned counsel for the parties submitted that the parties have settled the matter inter se between themselves vide settlement deed dated 17.12.2018 on their own free will, without any force or coercion and copy thereof has been placed on record.

3.

Learned counsel for the parties also submitted that in pursuance of the settlement between the parties, the petitioners have brought two separate demand drafts bearing Nos.010802 dated 17.12.2018 for an amount of Rs.9,00,000/- and 010803 dated 17.12.2018 for an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/-, which have been handed over to the respondent No.2.

4.

Learned counsel for the respondent No.2, on instructions from the respondent No.2/complainant, submitted that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the anticipatory bail applications filed by the petitioners bearing Nos.2702/2018 & 2704/2018 may be allowed.

5.

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the anticipatory bail applications are allowed. In case of arrest, each of the petitioners be admitted on bail subject to each of them furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/-, with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating Officer (I.O.). 6.

However, It is clarified that in case the 10 issues notice for the appearance of the petitioners for the purpose of investigation, the petitioners shall appear, co-operate and join the investigation. 7.

The anticipatory bail applications are disposed of in the above terms.

f 8.

However, it is clarified this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the anticipatory bail applications. CHANDER SHEKHAR, J DECEMBER 18, 2018/rk