Madhu Bala @ Madhu Devi v. State Of NCT Of Delhi

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1939/2017 MADHU BALA @ MADHU DEVI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ram Bir Chauhan, Adv.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA

O R D E R

% 27.11.2017 Vide the present petition, the applicant seeks anticipatory bail submitting that the deceased was her sister-in-law. The applicant came to know that her sister-in-law, deceased had committed suicide on 17.08.2017, whereas she, the applicant was married on 17.02.2004 and had been living in her matrimonial home with her two children and husband.

It is also submitted that the false and frivolous FIR registered at PS Narela related to allegations of dowry death against the applicant, though there was an extra marital relationship between the deceased Seema and a neighbour in relation to which the husband of the applicant/petitioner also lodged a complaint regarding false implication but the police officials of PS Narela without inquiring into the matter registered a false case against the

applicant and the applicant apprehends her arrest in the present case. It has also been submitted on behalf of the applicant that there was a conversation between the deceased and her mother on 17.08.2017, a few hours before her demise, indicating that all was normal and that the applicant has a CD of the same.

On behalf of the State, the application has been vehemently opposed and it has been submitted by the ld. APP for the State that the applicant‟s call details of her mobile number 9313633875 have been analyzed and it has been learnt that the applicant was present at the place of the occurrence, i.e., Bawana, JJ Colony, Delhi on dates 13.08.2017 to 17.08.2017 and that the father of the deceased in his statement u/s 161 of the Cr.P.C, 1973 had categorically stated in relation to the demand for kangans made by the applicant for the deceased as informed by his daughter since deceased. Taking into account the allegations against the applicant without any observations on the merits or demerits of the case, the anticipatory bail as prayed cannot be granted.

The petition is disposed of.

ANU MALHOTRA, J NOVEMBER 27, 2017 NR